Jones

Jones v. Nisleit

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20203:19-cv-01800California478 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARLO Q. JONES, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01800-MMA-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

vs. ACTION CHIEF DAVID LISLEIT, et al., Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff Marlo Q. Jones, while housed at the San Diego County Jail, and proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 18, 2019. See Compl., Doc. No. 1. I. Procedural History On October 8, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), but dismissed his Complaint for failing to state any claim upon which relief could be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and § 1915A(b). See Doc. No. 5. Plaintiff was advised of his pleading deficiencies and granted thirty (30) days leave in which to file an Amended Complaint that fixed them. See id. at 5-8. Plaintiff was also cautioned, however, that if he failed to file an Amended Complaint that cured his pleading defects,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.