Seawood

Seawood v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20203:19-cv-00555California9,518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAVON ANNETTE SEAWOOD, Case No.: 19-CV-555-LAB(WVG)

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION ON CROSS-

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting

JUDGMENT

Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. [Doc. Nos. 17, 18.]

17 This is an action for judicial review of a decision by the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Nancy A. Berryhill, denying Plaintiff Lavon Annette Seawood supplemental security income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”) and Social Security Disability Insurance under Title II of the Act. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the matter is before the undersigned Magistrate Judge for preparation of a Report and Recommendation. For the reasons stated below, the Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be DENIED and Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment be GRANTED. / / / / / / / / / 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.