Osuna

Osuna v. Pompo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20203:18-cv-02346California5,404 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ALEJANDRO OSUNA, Case No.: 18-CV-2346 W (MDD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING-IN-PART AND

DENYING-IN-PART DEFENDANTS’

DONATO VINCENT POMPO and

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

VINCENT NICHOLAS POMPO,

JUDGMENT [DOC. 27]; Defendants. 17 (2) GRANTING-IN-PART AND And Related Counter-Claim. DENYING-IN-PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT [DOC. 28.]

20 Pending before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment in this malicious prosecution dispute. Plaintiff Alejandro Osuna’s (“Osuna”) motion seeks summary judgment on its malicious prosecution claim and Defendants’ counterclaim for breach of fiduciary duty. (Pl’s MSJ Notice [Doc. 28] 2:13–27.) Defendants’ motion seeks summary adjudication regarding Osuna’s malicious prosecution claim. (Defs’ MSJ Notice [Doc. 27] 3:1–3.) The parties also filed requests for judicial notice. (Defs’ RJN [Doc. 27-5]; Pl’s RJN [Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.