Osuna
Osuna v. Pompo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ALEJANDRO OSUNA, Case No.: 18-CV-2346 W (MDD)
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) GRANTING-IN-PART AND
DENYING-IN-PART DEFENDANTS’
DONATO VINCENT POMPO and
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
VINCENT NICHOLAS POMPO,
JUDGMENT [DOC. 27]; Defendants. 17 (2) GRANTING-IN-PART AND And Related Counter-Claim. DENYING-IN-PART PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT [DOC. 28.]
20 Pending before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment in this malicious prosecution dispute. Plaintiff Alejandro Osuna’s (“Osuna”) motion seeks summary judgment on its malicious prosecution claim and Defendants’ counterclaim for breach of fiduciary duty. (Pl’s MSJ Notice [Doc. 28] 2:13–27.) Defendants’ motion seeks summary adjudication regarding Osuna’s malicious prosecution claim. (Defs’ MSJ Notice [Doc. 27] 3:1–3.) The parties also filed requests for judicial notice. (Defs’ RJN [Doc. 27-5]; Pl’s RJN [Doc.…