Contreras

Contreras v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20203:19-cv-00482California12,723 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 3:19-cv-00482-GPC-NLS

PRECILA CARDINAL CONTRERAS,

ORDER DECLINING TO ADOPT

Plaintiff, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION,

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v.

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,

DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND Social Security, REMANDING FOR FURTHER ADMININSTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS. Defendants. 17 [ECF No. 12, 16, 21.] 18 Precila Contreras (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of the Social Security Administration’s (“Defendant”) final decision denying her claim for disability insurance benefits. (ECF No. 1.) This case was referred for a report and recommendation on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); (ECF Nos. 12, 16, 21.) After careful consideration of Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes’ report and recommendation (“R&R”), the pleadings, the supporting documents,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.