Parrish

Parrish v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20203:19-cv-01321California494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TERESA P., Case No.: 19cv1321-CAB-RBB

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) ADOPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. No. 14]; (2) GRANTING IN PART ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of

AND DENYING IN PART

Social Security, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR Defendant. SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. No. 15 10]; (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

17 JUDGMENT [Doc. No. 12]; and (4) REMANDING FOR FURTHER

PROCEEDINGS

21 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 22 Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks, filed on February 27, 2020, recommending that the 23 Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff Teresa P.’s motion for summary judgment, 24 grant in part and deny in part Defendant Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, 25 and remand for further proceedings. [Doc. No. 14.] 26 Federal Rule of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.