Barnard

Barnard v. The United States Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.)

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20203:20-cv-00493California1,670 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAVID BARNARD, Case No.: 20-cv-493-GPC(MDD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS),

PAUPERIS, AND

DHS MANAGEMENT DIRECTORATE

(DHS-MGMT), FEDERAL (2) SUA SPONTE DISMISSING

PROTECTIVE SERVICES (FPS) P.

COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO YOUNG (ID NO. 1074), and DOES

STATE A CLAIM WITH LEAVE TO

through 5, all in their individual capacity,

AMEND

inclusive; in the same incident; THE

UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND

BORDER PROTETION, and DOES 6 through 10, all in their individual capacity, 20 inclusive, 21 Defendants.

23 On March 16, 2020, Plaintiff David Barnard, proceeding pro se, and in forma 24 pauperis (“IFP”), filed a civil rights complaint against Defendant P. Young (ID No. 25 1074), a Protective Security Officer (“PSO”), U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 26 DHS Management Directorate, General Services…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.