Reed

Reed v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20203:18-cv-00361California315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18cv361-JLS-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. REQUEST FOR STAMPED COPY

OF ECF NO. 113

DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 122] 14 15 16 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for a court-stamped copy of Plaintiff’s second request to replace the magistrate judge and clerk assigned to his case [ECF No. 113]. ECF No. 122. Plaintiff states that he is requesting the copy because he is proceeding in forma pauperis and cannot afford copies. Id. “The statute providing authority to proceed in forma pauperis, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, does not include the right to obtain court documents without payment.” Davidson v. Sullivan, No. 17cv0421 H (MDD), 2018 WL 2837472, at *42 (S.D. Cal. June 8, 2018), report and recommendation adopted sub nom. Davidson v. Kernan, No. 3:17-cv-00421-H-MDD, 2018 WL 3913395 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2018); see also Tedder v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.