Seegert
Seegert v. Rexall Sundown, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SANDRA SEEGERT, individually and on Case No.: 3:17-cv-01243-BEN-JLB behalf of all others similarly situated,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 v. (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
REXALL SUNDOWN, INC.,
JUDGMENT Defendant. 16 (2) DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION
[Doc. Nos. 107, 101]
20 Before the Court is Plaintiff Sandra Seegert’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Class Certification, and Defendant Rexall Sundown, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court finds them suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1(d)(1). BACKGROUND This case arises out of Defendant’s alleged false statements about the joint health 27 28 benefits of its Osteo Bi-Flex product line. Plaintiff alleges she purchased Osteo Bi-Flex Triple Strength on…