Erhart

Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20203:15-cv-02287California9,099 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 CHARLES MATTHEW ERHART, Case No. 15-cv-02287-BAS-NLS consolidated with Plaintiff, 15-cv-02353-BAS-NLS

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART

BOFI HOLDING, INC., CHARLES ERHART’S

MOTION TO EXCLUDE

Defendant. EXPERT TESTIMONY (ECF No. 128)

20 21 And Consolidated Case 22 23 Presently before the Court is Charles Erhart’s motion to exclude the opinions of two experts that BofI Federal Bank plans to call at trial. (ECF No. 128.) BofI opposes. (ECF No. 152.) The Court finds this motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 7.1(d). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Erhart’s motion. BACKGROUND The Court and the parties are well versed in the background of these consolidated actions. The Court incorporates its summary of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.