Chavez

Chavez v. Shimmick Construction Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20203:20-cv-00594California601 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD CHAVEZ, Case No. 20-cv-594-MMA (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED

SHIMMICK CONSTRUCTION

COMPLAINT

COMPANY, INC.,

15 Defendant. [Doc. No. 5] 16 17 On March 27, 2020, Richard Chavez (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Shimmick Construction Company, Inc. (“Defendant”). See Doc. No. 1. On April 1, 2020, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. See Doc. No. 4. On April 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed the present ex parte motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. See Doc. No. 5. Plaintiff has not yet served Defendant. See id. at 3. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 governs amendment of pleadings. If a party has already amended a pleading as a matter of course, the party seeking further amendment “may amend its pleading only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave. The court should freely give leave when…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.