Adams

Adams v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20203:19-cv-00335California3,711 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 Case No.: 19cv335-BLM LLOYD LYNTON ADAMS,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the Social [ECF No. 24] Security Administration, 13 Defendant.

15 On December 11, 2019, Plaintiff Lloyd Lynton Adams filed a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. ECF No. 24-1 (“Pl.’s Mot.”). Defendant filed an opposition to the motion on January 17, 2020 [ECF No. 26 (“Def.’s Opp.”)] and Plaintiff filed his reply on January 24, 2020 [ECF No. 27 (“Pl.’s Reply”)]. After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion. BACKGROUND On February 15, 2019, Plaintiff commenced the present action, seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of his application for Social Security Income and Social Security Disability Insurance benefits. ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.