Motlagh

Motlagh v. Qatar Airways, Q.C.S.C.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20203:18-cv-02829California4,210 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEYVAN NASSIRI MOTLAGH, Case No.: 3:18-cv-2829-BTM-AHG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. DISMISS FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER

QATAR AIRWAYS, Q.C.S.C, a JURISDICTION foreign business corporation d/b/a

QATAR AIRWAYS; and DOES 1-

25, inclusive, 16 Defendants. [ECF NO. 4] 17 Before the Court is Defendant Qatar Airways, Q.C.S.C.’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on matters collateral to the merits of this case. (ECF No. 4.) “A jurisdictional challenge under Rule 12(b)(1) may be made either on the face of the pleadings or by presenting extrinsic evidence.” Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc., 328 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir. 2003) (citations omitted). “Where the jurisdictional issue is separable from the merits of the case, the judge may consider the evidence presented with respect to the jurisdictional issue and rule on that issue, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.