Whatley
Whatley v. Valdovinos
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 REGINALD WHATLEY, Case No. 3:18-cv-02761-CAB-BGS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART EX v. PARTE APPLICATION FOR COURT TO SCREEN
PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
G. VALDOVINOS, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
Defendants. RESPONSIVE PLEADING [Doc. No. 43.]
18 On April 6, 2020 Defendant G. Valdovinos applied ex parte for (1) the Court 19 to screen Plaintiff Reginald Whatley’s Second Amended Complaint (SAC); and (2) 20 an extension of time to file a responsive pleading to the SAC. [Doc. No. 43.] 21 The Court HEREBY ORDERS: 22 1) The application for the court to screen the SAC is DENIED as the 23 requested relief is inappropriate. See Rincon v. Cate, 2011 WL 1642615, at 24 *1-2 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2011)(“nothing in . . . §1915A permits 25 Defendants to request the Court do anything sua sponte). 26 2) Defendant Valdovinos’ request for an extension of time to file a…