Ceballos

Ceballos v. Becerra

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20203:20-cv-00563California2,006 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CINDY MARIE CEBALLOS, Case No.: 20cv0563-AJB (LL)

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE XAVIER BECERRA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and has paid the filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) The Petition is subject to dismissal because Petitioner has failed to name a proper Respondent. In addition, although Petitioner indicates she has exhausted state court remedies as to claims one and two, she indicates she has not done so for claims three and four. However, no grounds for relief as to claims three and four are presented. To the extent Petitioner wishes to raise unexhausted claims, the Court will notify her of her options in that regard. Review of the Petition reveals that Petitioner has failed to name a proper respondent. On federal habeas, a state prisoner must name the state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.