Allison

Johnson v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20203:19-cv-01673California262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID LEONARD JOHNSON, Case No.: 19cv1673-LAB (KSC)

Petitioner,

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO

v. COMPLY WITH DEADLINES MARION SPEARMAN, Warden, Respondent. 16 On April 7, Magistrate Judge Karen Crawford issued her report and recommendation. Any objections were required to be filed by May 8, 2020, and any reply to the objections no later than May 22. At present, the Clerk’s office is physically inaccessible because of restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, though documents may be still be filed by mail or electronically. These deadlines take into account the present situation, and the parties should continue to comply with them regardless of whether the Clerk’s office continues to be physically inaccessible. The case is not stayed. If compliance with the deadlines becomes impractical or impossible, the parties should seek an extension by ex parte motion, which must explain why an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.