Ramirez

Ramirez v. Zimmerman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20203:17-cv-01230-BAS-AHGCalifornia655 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 JAIRO CERVANTES, et al., CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS: 11 Plaintiffs, Case No. 17-cv-1230-BAS-AHG v. Case No. 18-cv-1062-BAS-AHG

SAN DIEGO POLICE CHIEF ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ SHELLEY ZIMMERMAN, et al., EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD FOR Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION 15 [ECF No. 157]

BRYAN PEASE,

Plaintiff, v. SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF WILLIAM GORE, et al., 20 Defendants.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application to supplement the record on summary judgment with the bodyworn camera (BWC) footage of three officers. (ECF No. 157.) The City opposes. (ECF No. 160.) “The ‘opportunities for legitimate ex parte applications are extremely limited.’” Horne v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 969 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1205 (C.D. Cal. 2013) (quoting In re Intermagnetics America, Inc., 101 B.R. 191, 193 (C.D. Cal. 1989)). To warrant relief, an ex parte…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.