Keating

Keating v. Jastremski

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20203:15-cv-00057California1,332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEREMY L. KEATING ET AL., CASE NO. 3:15-cv-00057-L-AGS

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING v. PLAINTIFFS’/COUNTER-

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEAL

14 JOHN A. JASTREMSKI ET AL., (Doc. no. 438) 15 Defendants.

AND RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS.

Pending before the Court in this action alleging misappropriation of trade secrets is an unopposed motion filed by Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Jeremy Keating, Richard P. Gigliotti, and Alexander J. Mele (collectively, the “Keating Group”) to seal portions of the Special Master’s report and recommendation. (Docs. no. 428, 440 (“Recommendation”).) For the reasons which follow, the motion is denied. The Court appointed Hon. Ronald S. Prager (Ret.) as the Special Master pursuant to Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (docs. no. 316, 323) to prepare a report and recommendation on two motions for sanctions and related fee applications. The subject of the Recommendation is the motion for terminating 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.