Amaraut

Amaraut v. Sprint/United Management Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20203:19-cv-00411California7,415 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VLADIMIR AMARAUT, on behalf of Case No.: 3:19-cv-411-WQH-AHG himself and all others similarly situated, 12 et al., ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ORDER LIMITING Plaintiffs,

PLAINTIFFS’ AND PLAINTIFFS’

14 v. COUNSEL’S COMMUNICATIONS WITH CLASS AND COLLECTIVE

SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT

MEMBERS

COMPANY,

Defendant. [ECF No. 73]

25 26 27 28 Before the Court is Defendant Sprint/United Management Company’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Order Limiting Plaintiffs’ and Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s Communication with Class and Collective Members. ECF No. 73. This matter was referred to the undersigned by District Judge William Q. Hayes. ECF No. 86. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion. I. BACKGROUND On November 1, 2019, Plaintiffs Vladimir Amaraut, Katherine Almonte, Corbin 8 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.