Doe

Doe v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20203:19-cv-02335California7,589 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JANE DOE, Case No.: 19cv2335 JM (AGS) Plaintiff,

ORDER ON COUNTY OF SAN

v. DIEGO’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

TIMOTHY WILSON, COMPLAINT

14 Defendants. 15 16 On December 13, 2019, Defendant County of San Diego (“the County”) moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, (Doc. 1-3 (“Compl.”) at 166-78), alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state tort law. (Doc. No. 2-1 (“Mot.”).) Plaintiff filed her response in opposition on March 2, 2020, (Doc. No. 7 (“Opp.”), and the County filed a reply on March 9, 2020, (Doc. No. 9 (“Reply”).) On March 16, 2020, the court heard oral argument on the motion. For the below reasons, the motion is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges in her Complaint that on March 21, 2018, Timothy Wilson (“Wilson”) approached Plaintiff from behind and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.