Woodward

Woodward v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20203:17-cv-02369California3,833 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BESSIE WOODWARD, individually and Case No.: 17-CV-2369 JLS (KSC) as a Successor in Interest to LYLE 12 WOODWARD; and EDWARD ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ WOODWARD, individually and as MOTION TO AMEND FIRST Successor in Interest to LYLE AMENDED COMPLAINT

WOODWARD,

(ECF No. 33) Plaintiffs, 16 v.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; TREVOR

NEWKIRK; and DOES 1–20, Defendants.

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Bessie and Edward Woodward’s Motion to Amend Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 33). Defendant County of San Diego (the “County”) filed a Response in Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 36) and Plaintiffs filed a Reply in support of (“Reply,” ECF No. 38) Plaintiffs’ Motion. After considering Plaintiffs’ proposed amendments, the Parties’ arguments and the law, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion. / / / / / / BACKGROUND On December 3, 2016, inmate Clinton…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.