Barto

Barto v. Miyashiro

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20203:19-cv-02261California4,530 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JILANNE D. BARTO, an individual, Case No.: 19-cv-2261-WQH-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. DAVID MIYASHIRO, in his official capacity as Superintendent Cajon Valley 15 Union School District; JAMES MILLER, JO ALEGRIA, TAMARA OTERO, and KAREN CLARK-MEJIA, each in their 17 official capacity as Trustee of Cajon Valley Union School District Board of Trustees; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 HAYES, Judge: The matter before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Defendants David Miyashiro, James Miller, Jo Alegria, Tamara Otero, and Karen Clark-Mejia. (ECF No. 4). I. BACKGROUND On November 26, 2019, Plaintiff Jilanne D. Barto filed a Complaint against Defendants David Miyashiro in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Cajon Valley Union School District; James Miller, Jo Alegria, Tamara Otero, and Karen Clark-Mejia in their official capacities as Trustees of the Cajon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.