Reynolds

Reynolds v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20203:19-cv-01358California10,868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || DEANNA R., Case No.: 19cv1358-W(RBB) Plant) REPORT AND 13 |] V. RECOMMENDATION REGARDING |} ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY Social Security, JUDGMENT [ECF NOS. 13, 14]

Defendant. 17 On July 19, 2019, Plaintiff Deanna R.! commenced this action against Defendant

Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, for judicial review under 42 U.S.C.

section 405(g) of a final adverse decision for social security benefits [ECF No. 1]. Defendant filed the Administrative Record on October 21, 2019 [ECF No. 11]. On

November 25, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment or remand [ECF No.

13]. The Commissioner filed a cross-motion for summary judgment and an opposition to

24 || ————————— The Court refers to Plaintiff using only her first name and last initial pursuant to the Court's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.