Tuck
Tuck v. Cascadians, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ROY TUCK, as an individual; Case No.: 19-cv-1505-WQH-RBB DEBORAH TUCK, as an individual,
ORDER
Plaintiffs, 10 v. 11 WAYNE MCMULLEN, et. al., 12 Defendants. 13 HAYES, Judge: The matters before the Court are the Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint filed by Defendants Wayne McMullen, Donnie Drake, and Nancy McLennan (ECF No. 8) and Cascadians, Inc., and Associated Asset Management, LLC (ECF No. 24). I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On August 12, 2019, Plaintiffs Roy and Deborah Tuck, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint against Defendants Yes Energy Management, Inc. (“YEM”), Cascadians, Inc. (“Cascadians”), Champs, Associated Asset Management, LLC (“AAM”), Epsten Grinnel & Howell, APC, Wayne McMullen, Donnie Drake, Nancy McLennan, Amanda Shaw, Annette Imoto, Michelle Dennis, and Does through 10, inclusive. (ECF No. 1). Cascadians, AAM, YEM, Wayne McMullen, Donnie Drake, and Nancy McLennan are the only remaining Defendants. Plaintiffs bring claims against Defendants Cascadians, AAM, 26 …