Harrison

Harrison v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20203:20-cv-00647California1,334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID SCOTT HARRISON, Case No. 3:20-cv-0647-BAS-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) DENYING MOTION

v. FOR RECUSAL AND (2)

DISMISSING PETITION AS

RON BROOMFIELD, Warden,

SUCCESSIVE PETITION

Defendant. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A) GATEKEEPER

PROVISION

17 Petitioner David Scott Harrison has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Petitioner has also filed a “Motion Recuse All Judges and Magistrate Judges of the United States District Court, Southern District of California.” (ECF No. 3.) For the reasons discussed below, Petitioner’s motion for recusal is denied and this case is summarily dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. MOTION FOR RECUSAL Petitioner seeks recusal of all the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.