Petconnect Rescue, Inc. v. Salinas

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20203:20-cv-00527California413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PET CONNECT RESCUE, INC., a Case No.: 3:20-cv-00527-H-KSC Maryland corporation; LUCKY PUP 12 DOG RESCUE.COM, a California ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ corporation; and SARAH GONZALEZ, MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE an individual, COMPLAINT AS MOOT

Plaintiffs, [Doc. Nos. 10, 14, 15.] v.

DAVID SALINAS, et al., 17 Defendants.

On March 20, 2020, Plaintiff Pet Connect Rescue, Inc. filed a complaint against Defendants David Salinas, Veronica Salinas, Richard Robles Pena, The Puppy Store, LLC, Yellow Store Enterprises, LLC, SoCal Puppy Adoptions, Inc., Pet Connect Rescue, Inc., Alysia Rothman, Ray Rothman, Jase Demetrius Shamore, Critters and Pets/Furry and Feather, LLC, Rickie Gallardo, and 360 Clean N Go, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. No. 1.) On April 3, 2020, Defendants filed motions to dismiss1 Plaintiff’s complaint, claiming Plaintiff did not satisfy the requirements for diversity jurisdiction. (Doc. Nos. 10, 26 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.