Irizarry

Irizarry v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20203:19-cv-00476California484 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AIDA I., Case No.: 3:19-cv-00476-AJB-RNB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. Social Security, No. 25); Defendant. 16 (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 21);

(3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

20 JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 22).

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. (Doc. Nos. 21–22.) The Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block for a Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”), which was issued on January 28, 2020. (Doc. No. 25.) The Magistrate Judge recommends “that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be GRANTED, that the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment be DENIED, and that Judgment be entered reversing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.