Mettler

Mettler v. Government Employees Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20203:18-cv-02303California7,469 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 MATTHEW METTLER, Case No. 18-cv-2303-BAS-MSB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. [ECF No. 34] GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

INSURANCE COMPANY,

15 Defendant.

17 In 2018, Plaintiff Matthew Mettler sued Defendant Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”) for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. (ECF No. 1-2.) GEICO now moves for summary judgment on some of Plaintiff’s claims. (“Mot.,” ECF No. 34.) Plaintiff filed an opposition to the Motion, (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 36), to which GEICO replied, (“Reply,” ECF No. 38). The Court finds this Motion suitable for determination on 24 25 1 Along with its reply brief, GEICO submitted various objections to Plaintiff’s evidence. (ECF No. 38-3.) The first piece of contested evidence is John DiMugno’s report, which Plaintiff attached to his opposition. (ECF No. 36-3.) DiMugno opines on the issue of whether GEICO was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.