Arellano

Arellano v. Blahnik

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20203:16-cv-02412California1,636 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ARELLANO, Case No.: 16cv2412-CAB (MSB) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

BLAHNIK, [ECF No. 149] Defendant. 16 17 On February 14, 2020, this Court issued an “Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration.” (ECF No. 147.) On March 2, 2020, Plaintiff filed “Motion: 59(e); or 60(b) in regard to ‘Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration,’” seeking relief from the Court’s denial of reconsideration. (ECF No. 149.) A. Legal Standard Plaintiff asserts this motion under, alternatively, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b). (See ECF No. 149 at 1.) As this Court noted when ruling on Plaintiff’s previous motion for reconsideration, because “Rule 59(e) ‘clearly contemplates entry of judgment as a predicate to any motion,’” and there has been no entry of judgment in this case, Rule 59(e)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.