Huerta

Huerta v. Nielsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20203:18-cv-01640California463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID HUERTA, Case No.: 18cv1640-MMA (LL)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF

v. COURT TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S

OPPOSITION BRIEF;

NIELSEN, et al.,

Defendants. [Doc. No. 38-1]

VACATING MOTION HEARING

17 Plaintiff David Huerta is a Seized Property Specialist with United States Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. He brings this action pro se pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, which protects federal employees from discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Plaintiff alleges that his supervisor racially discriminated and retaliated against him. See Doc. No. 1. The government moves for summary judgment as to all claims. See Doc. No. 33. The government’s motion is currently set for hearing on April 27, 2020. As such, Plaintiff’s response in opposition to the motion was due for filing on or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.