Dean
Arellano, Jr. v. Dean
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RAUL ARELLANO, JR., Case No.: 15-CV-2247 JLS (JLB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. RECONSIDER
DR. K. DEAN, et al., (ECF No. 119) Defendants. 17 18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider (“Mot.,” ECF No. 119). Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider its March 20, 2020 Order in which the Court denied reconsideration of its previous ruling granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant Pasha. District courts may “reconsider and revise a previous interlocutory decision” at any time before final judgment. Hydranautics v. FilmTec Corp., 306 F. Supp. 2d 958, 968 (S.D. Cal. 2003); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). In the Southern District of California, a party may apply for reconsideration “[w]henever any motion or any application or petition for any order or other relief has been made to any judge and has been refused in whole or in part.” Civ. Local R.…