Arellano

Arellano v. Officer Hodge

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20203:14-cv-00590California2,509 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ARELLANO, JR., Case No.: 14-CV-590 JLS (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) OVERRULING

v. DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS; (2) ADOPTING REPORT AND OFFICER HODGE, et al.,

RECOMMENDATION;

Defendants. (3) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; AND (4) DENYING

MOTIONS FOR COPIES AND

RECONSIDERATION AS MOOT

19 (ECF Nos. 164, 209, 225, 227, 229) 20 Presently before the Court are Defendants J. Chau, D. Hodge, F. Sedighi, K. Seeley, M. Glynn, P. Velardi and L. Zamora’s Motion for Summary Judgment, (“MSJ,” ECF No. 164). Also before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt’s Report and Recommendation, in which she recommends the Court to grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion (“R&R,” ECF No. 209). Defendants filed Objections to the R&R, (“Obj.,” ECF No. 212). Plaintiff did not file timely objections. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.