Bloom

Bloom v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20203:17-cv-02324California2,347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL BLOOM, STEPHEN Case No.: 17-CV-2324-AJB-MSB

CHATZKY, TONY DIAZ, VALERIE

ORDER:

GRISCHY, PENNY HELMS,

BENJAMIN HERNANDEZ, DOUG (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

HIGGINS, SUZONNE KEITH,

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE GERALD STARK, ANNA STARK, and

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT,

DAVID WILSON, individually and on (Doc. No. 93); AND behalf of themselves and all others 16 similarly situated, (2) DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs,

AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

v. FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, (Doc. No. 109). CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant. 20 Presently before the Court are: (1) Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), and (2) Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. (Doc. Nos. 93, 109.) Defendant City of San Diego (“the City”) opposes both motions. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.