Bloom
Bloom v. City of San Diego
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20203:17-cv-02324California2,347 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL BLOOM, STEPHEN Case No.: 17-CV-2324-AJB-MSB
CHATZKY, TONY DIAZ, VALERIE
ORDER:
GRISCHY, PENNY HELMS,
BENJAMIN HERNANDEZ, DOUG (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
HIGGINS, SUZONNE KEITH,
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE GERALD STARK, ANNA STARK, and
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT,
DAVID WILSON, individually and on (Doc. No. 93); AND behalf of themselves and all others 16 similarly situated, (2) DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs,
AS MOOT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
v. FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, (Doc. No. 109). CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant. 20 Presently before the Court are: (1) Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), and (2) Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. (Doc. Nos. 93, 109.) Defendant City of San Diego (“the City”) opposes both motions. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to …