Arellano

Arellano v. Ojeda

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20203:14-cv-02401California569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ARELLANO, JR., Case No. 3:14-cv-02401-MMA-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

vs. MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 59(E)

E. OJEDA, et al., [Doc. No. 123] Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff Raul Arellano, Jr., a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings an Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arising out of allegations that prison officials failed to adequately respond when his cell toilet clogged and overflowed over the course of a long weekend in April 2014. As relevant here, Defendants O. Mack and L. Helmick previously moved for summary judgment on the ground that they are entitled to qualified immunity from suit. See Doc. No. 101. The Court granted the motion and entered judgment in favor of Defendants. See Doc. Nos. 105, 106. Plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the Court’s ruling and judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.