Brangwynne

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DENNIS SMITH, Case No.: 19cv620-CAB-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT [Doc. No. 31] AND DEPUTY K. BRANGWYNNE, et al.,

CLOSING CASE

Defendant. 15 On March 17, 2020, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”). [Doc. No. 31.] The Motion was set for hearing (without oral argument) on April 21, 2020. Id. Per Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion should have been filed and served by April 7, 2020. To date, no opposition has been filed. On April 13, 2020, Defendants filed Notice Re: No Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Notice”), noting that Plaintiff had not filed or served any opposition to the Motion. [Doc. No. 32.] Plaintiff has also not responded to the Notice. Civil Local Rule 7.1.e.2. requires a party opposing a motion to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition…