Sekerke
Sekerke v. Leo
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20203:19-cv-00034California4,744 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH WAYNE SEKERKE, Case No.: 3:19-cv-0034-GPC-RBB Booking No. 18165284,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ vs. MOTION TO DISMISS PORTIONS
OF PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
ARTURO LEON; MARK O’BRIEN; VACATING HEARING
JON MONTGOMERY; DANE OLSEN
and COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, [ECF No. 58] Defendants. 19 Before the Court is Defendants Arturo Leon and Mark O’Brien’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First, Second, Third, and Fifth claims for relief in the Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 54, “SAC”). ECF No. 58. Plaintiff filed an opposition on March 25, 2020. ECF No. 65. Defendants filed a reply on March 31, 2020. ECF No. 66. The Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion and VACATES the hearing on the motion that was scheduled for April 17, 2020. I. Procedural Background …