Torres

Torres v. Larios

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20203:20-cv-00749California579 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GILBERT ANTHONY TORRES, Case No.: 3:20-cv-0749-GPC-WVG

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

LARIOS, Correctional Officer, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE FILING FEE REQUIREMENT Petitioner has failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee and has failed to move to proceed in forma pauperis. Because this Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the $5.00 filing fee or qualified to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court DISMISSES the case without prejudice. See Rule 3(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM ON FEDERAL HABEAS In addition, it appears to the Court that a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus brought pursuant to § 2254 is not the proper vehicle for the claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.