Grano
Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20203:18-cv-01818California2,822 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 Case Nos.: 18cv1818-GPC(BLM) VINCENT GRANO,
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT
SODEXO’S MANAGEMENT INC.’S EX
v. PARTE MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE
ORDER STAYING DEPOSITIONS
SODEXO MANAGEMENT, INC., et al.,
Defendants. [ECF No. 116] ____________________________________
AND RELATED CASES
13 Currently before the Court is Defendant Sodexo Management Inc.’s April 17, 2020 Motion for Protective Order Staying Depositions [ECF No. 116 (“Mot.”)], Defendant Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.’s April 20, 2020 opposition to the motion [ECF No. 120 (“Cargill Oppo.”)], and Plaintiffs’ April 20, 2020 opposition to the motion [ECF No. 119 (“P.s’ Oppo.”)]. For the reasons set forth below, Sodexo’s motion is DENIED. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On March 4, 2020 Governor Gavin Newsom proclaimed a state of emergency in California as the result of COVID-19. See …