Arellano
Arellano v. Sedighi
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Raul ARELLANO,, Case No.: 3:15-cv-02059-AJB-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) PROVIDING NOTICE OF
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
SEDIGHI, et al.,
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO
Defendants. KLINGELE v. EIKENBERRY AND RAND v. ROWLAND 16 (2) VACATING HEARING DATE (3) SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
19 NOTICE REGARDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 21 This notice is required to be given to you pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1035 (1999) and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988): Defendants Sedighi, et al., have filed a motion for summary judgment in your case under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If the motion is granted, it will end your case. 28 Defendants filed the Motion for Summary Judgment on April 13, 2020 with a hearing date…