Arellano

Arellano v. Sedighi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20203:15-cv-02059California555 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Raul ARELLANO,, Case No.: 3:15-cv-02059-AJB-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) PROVIDING NOTICE OF

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

SEDIGHI, et al.,

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO

Defendants. KLINGELE v. EIKENBERRY AND RAND v. ROWLAND 16 (2) VACATING HEARING DATE (3) SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE ON MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

19 NOTICE REGARDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 21 This notice is required to be given to you pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1035 (1999) and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988): Defendants Sedighi, et al., have filed a motion for summary judgment in your case under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If the motion is granted, it will end your case. 28 Defendants filed the Motion for Summary Judgment on April 13, 2020 with a hearing date…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.