Keely

Keely v. Skylab Apps, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20203:19-cv-02078California1,121 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HEATHER HOLLANDER KEELY, Case No.: 19-CV-2078-CAB-KSC STEVE WOLF, and BRITTANY

DOSTER, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

STRIKE Plaintiffs, 14 SKYLAB APPS, INC. et al, [Doc. No. 33] 15 Defendants.

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

17 18 On January 20, 2020, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs Skylab Apps, Inc. and Dean Grey (together, “Skylab”) filed an answer and first amended counterclaim (“FAC”) that asserted three claims against Heather Hollander Keely, Steve Wolf, and Brittany Doster (together, “Counter-Defendants”): (1) breach of contract; (2) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage; and (3) defamation. On February 3, 2020, Counter- Defendants filed a motion to dismiss all three counterclaims or for a more definite statement. On March 13, 2020, the Court denied that motion. A week later, on March 20, 2020, Counter-Defendants filed a motion to strike paragraph of the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.