(PC) Richardson v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20203:20-cv-00356California3,156 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARDSON, Donn, Case No.: 3:20-cv-0356-WQH-RBM

CDCR #AC-9306,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

[ECF No. 2]

W.L. MONTGOMERY; M. POLLARD;

L. HATFIELD; E. NUNEZ; A. AND

BARRIOS; D. POLLARD; P.

SAUCEDO; D. WHITE; J. SPAICH; 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

H. LIU, FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

Defendants. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) & 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 20 21 Donn Richardson (“Plaintiff”), currently incarcerated at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”) located in Crescent City, California and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Compl., ECF No. 1). Plaintiff claims prison officials at Calipatria State Prison (“CAL”), along with California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) officials in Sacramento violated his right to due process when they refused…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.