Musgrove
Musgrove v. Pierce
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20203:20-cv-00655California455 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IRVIN MUSGROVE, Case No.: 20cv655-JAH (LL)
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION MARGERY PIERCE; KEYSA
WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
MACHADO; OCEANSIDE HOUSING
FAILING TO PAY FILING FEE
AUTHORITY,
REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 16 Defendants. AND/OR FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a);
(2) DISMISSING AS MOOT
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
20 ELECTRONICALLY FILE (Doc. No. 2) Irvin Musgrove (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, has filed a civil action. See Doc. No. 1. I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in any district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 27 28 1 || $400'. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed…