Musgrove

Musgrove v. Pierce

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20203:20-cv-00655California455 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IRVIN MUSGROVE, Case No.: 20cv655-JAH (LL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION MARGERY PIERCE; KEYSA

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

MACHADO; OCEANSIDE HOUSING

FAILING TO PAY FILING FEE

AUTHORITY,

REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) 16 Defendants. AND/OR FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a);

(2) DISMISSING AS MOOT

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

20 ELECTRONICALLY FILE (Doc. No. 2) Irvin Musgrove (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, has filed a civil action. See Doc. No. 1. I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in any district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 27 28 1 || $400'. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.