Webb

Webb v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20203:20-cv-00735California783 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD DE’VONN WEBB Case No. 20-CV-735 JLS (BGS)

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE PETITION WARREN MONTGOMERY, Respondent. 16 Petitioner Richard De’Vonn Webb, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has submitted a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Pet.,” ECF No. 1). For the following reasons, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Petition. ANALYSIS I. Failure to Satisfy Filing Fee Requirement A Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus must either be accompanied by a $5.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 3(a); 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. Petitioner has not paid the $5.00 filing fee and has not filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If Petitioner wishes to proceed, he must either pay the $5.00 fee or submit adequate proof he cannot pay the fee. / / / / / / II. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.