Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20203:19-cv-02098California3,811 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE LUIS BARAJAS CENTENO, Case No.: 19cv2098-L-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO COMPEL AMENDED

RESPONSES

CITY OF CARLSBAD, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 39]

17 Currently before the Court is Defendants City of Carlsbad (“City”) and Jordan 18 Walker (“Walker”)’s “Consolidated Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for 19 Admissions” (“Mot.”) [ECF No. 39] and Plaintiff’s Opposition (“Opp.”) [ECF No. 41].1 20 For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion.

RELEVANT BACKGROUND

22 On September 16, 2019, Plaintiff filed the instant suit against Defendants City and 23 Walker alleging a violation of his civil rights under state and federal law. See ECF No. 1- 24 2 at 2-7. On November 11, 2019, the suit was subsequently removed by Defendants to 25 Federal Court. See ECF No. 1. Of particular relevance to Defendants’ Motion, Plaintiff 26 27 1 Plaintiff’s counsel separately filed a declaration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.