Joseph

Joseph v. Clayton

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20203:19-cv-02139California623 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALONZO JOSEPH, Case No. 3:19-cv-2139-GPC-RBM

CDCR #K-62045,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION PURSUANT vs. TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND 14 § 1915A(b) AND FOR FAILING

TO PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE Dr. DAVID CLAYTON, M.D., WITH COURT ORDER 16 Defendant. REQUIRING AMENDMENT 17 18 Plaintiff Alonzo Joseph, proceeding pro se, currently incarcerated at California State Prison‒Sacramento, filed a civil complaint against Dr. David Clayton, a medical doctor employed at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, CA. (Dkt. No. 1-3, Compl. at 2‒5.) He alleges Dr. Clayton’s decision in 2018 to discontinue Tramadol in favor of non-narcotic pain relievers caused him severe pain and invoked the Eighth Amendment. (Id. at 6-8.) He claims that Dr. Clayton cut him off from his pain medication without any penological reason. (Id.) Joseph further alleges Dr. Clayton 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.