Saul

Black v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20203:20-cv-00772California1,620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KATHLEEN BLACK, Case No.: 20cv772-NLS

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

Social Security, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; Defendant. and

(2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

[ECF No. 2]

21 Before the Court is Plaintiff Kathleen Black’s complaint seeking judicial review of the Social Security Administration’s decision and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1-2. After due consideration and for the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that Plaintiff meets the financial requirements for IFP but DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend, if amended within 60 days of the date of this order. // I. Motion to Proceed IFP It is well-settled that a party need not be completely destitute to proceed IFP. 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.