Bonilla

Bonilla v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20203:20-cv-00203California1,665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00203-CAB-KSC

CDCR #J-48500,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

UNKNOWN,

[ECF No. 3] Defendant. AND

18 2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING

FEE REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. §

20 1914(a)

24 Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at San 25 Quentin State Prison has filed a civil action captioned “In re: to the matter of Steven Wayne 26 Bonilla,” seeking a declaration that his Alameda County Superior Court capital conviction 27 and sentence are void. (See ECF No. 1, Compl., at 1.) On February 18, 2020, the Court 28 dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. Section 1914(a) and/or to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.