Prunty

Prunty v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20203:20-cv-00572California3,337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN PRUNTY, et al., Case No. 20-cv-572-MMA (AGS)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

v. LINCOLN MILITARY PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT, LP’S MOTION TO

CAMP PENDLETON & QUANTICO

DISMISS

HOUSING LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. [Doc. No. 3] 16 17 18 On February 18, 2020 Plaintiffs Ryan Prunty (“Ryan”); Cynthia Prunty (“Cynthia”); Grant Prunty (“Grant”), a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Tony Vasquez; Garrett Prunty (“Garrett”), by and through his guardian ad litem, Tony Vasquez; and Granger Prunty (“Granger”), by and through his guardian ad litem, Tony Vasquez, (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. See Doc. No. 1-2 (Compl.). Plaintiffs allege nine causes of 25 26 1 The Court refers to the individual Plaintiffs’ first names for clarity.

28 action: (1) negligence; (2) nuisance; (3) negligent misrepresentation; (4) negligent infliction of emotional distress; (5)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.