Kinney

Kinney v. Miller

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20203:14-cv-01136California1,910 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARK LEWIS KINNEY, Case No.: 14cv1136-JAH (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING THE

v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION;

AMY MILLER, Warden,

DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT

Defendant. OF HABEAS CORPUS; AND

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

16 INTRODUCTION Petitioner Mark Lewis Kinney (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a writ of habeas corpus (“Petition”) under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. No. 1. Respondent Amy Miller (“Respondent”) filed an answer and supporting memorandum of points and authorities to which Petitioner filed a traverse. Doc. Nos. 6, 26. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen Crawford for a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Judge Crawford’s Report recommended denying the petition in its entirety, and Petitioner filed objections to the Report. After careful…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.