Carmichael
Carmichael v. County of San Diego
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20203:19-cv-01750California1,175 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIRK MATTHEW CARMICHAEL, Case No. 19-cv-01750-GPC-AGS ROBERT E. BASKIN on behalf of
STARS IN THE SKY TRUST, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR
Plaintiff, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND
ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
v.
CAUSE FOR WHY THIS ACTION
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, PETER SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED.
ESTES, SUMMER STEPHAN,
16 MICHAEL HOLMES, JOHN STALEY, (ECF No. 20.) AUTONATION DBA BMW OF
ENCINITAS, TOYOTA OF
ESCONDIDO, AND DOES 1-
inclusive,
20 Defendants. 21 The instant order arises from a defendant’s motion to dismiss the case for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 20.) Finding that a less drastic sanction than outright dismissal would be more appropriate under the circumstances, the Court DENIES the motion. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing, on or before May 8, 2020, why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to timely respond to this Order…