Stasi

Stasi v. Inmediata Health Group Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20203:19-cv-02353California8,552 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 VICKI STASI, SHANE WHITE, and Case No.: 19cv2353 JM (LL) CRYSTAL GARCIA, individually and on 11 behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS v.

INMEDIATA HEALTH GROUP CORP.,

15 Defendant.

Defendant Inmediata Health Group Corp. (“Inmediata”) moves to dismiss this putative class action brought by Plaintiffs Vicki Stasi, Shane White, and Chrystal Garcia (“Plaintiffs”) under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). The motion has been briefed and the court finds it suitable for submission without oral argument in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the below reasons, Inmediata’s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND In their Complaint, Plaintiffs allege that in January of 2019, Inmediata learned it was experiencing a large “data security incident” resulting in the exposure of “personal information” of over 1.5 million…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.